Development of Islamic Bank Performance Measurement Using The Maslahah Performa (MaP) Approach

Syahdatul Maulida*    -  Tazkia University, Indonesia
Achmad Firdaus    -  Tazkia University, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

The objective of the research is to develop a performance measurement model for Islamic banks using the Maslahah Performa (MaP) approach. The performance measurement model encompasses six MaP maslahah orientations, namely worship, internal processes, talent, learning, customers, and wealth, with each maslahah orientation comprising specific measures, formulas, and targets. The development of performance measures is informed by a comprehensive array of sources, including the Qur'an and Hadith, financial statements, sustainability reports, Islamic bank governance, and regulations established by the OJK and Bank Indonesia. The research design entailed an exploratory study, wherein secondary data was obtained from financial reports, sustainability reports, Islamic bank governance reports, OJK and Bank Indonesia regulations, and other sources. Data samples were obtained from the annual reports of Bank Syariah Indonesia and Bank Muamalat. The selection of these two banks was made with the consideration that they can represent the classification of the Bank Group Based on Tier 1 Capital (KBMI). The findings from the data analysis were then used to develop a more comprehensive understanding of the application of maqashid sharia in measuring the performance of Islamic banks. The implications of this study for Islamic banking practitioners are that the application of the MaP model can help make more maqashid sharia-based decisions, ensuring a balance between profitability and social sustainability. Moreover, the findings of this study can serve as a foundation for regulators to formulate policies and regulations that more effectively support the integration of maqashid sharia principles in the performance assessment of Islamic banks.

Keywords : Maslahah Performa; Maqashid Sharia; Sharia Banking

  1. Shariah Standard No. (12) Sharikah (Musharakah) and Modern Corporations. https://aaoifi.com/ss-12-sharikah-musharakah-and-modern-corporations/?lang=en
  2. Shariah Standard No. (13) Mudharabah. https://aaoifi.com/s-13-mudarabah/?lang=en
  3. Alhammadi, S. (2022). Analyzing the Role of Islamic Finance in Kuwait Regarding Sustainable Economic Development in COVID-19 Era. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020701
  4. Alhammadi, S., Alotaibi, K. O., & Hakam, D. F. (2022). Analysing Islamic banking ethical performance from Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah perspective: evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 12(4), 1171–1193. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1848179
  5. Antonio, M. S. (2001). Bank Syariah Dari Teori Ke Praktik. Gema Insani Press.
  6. Ascarya, A., & Sukmana, R. (2017). Measuring the Islamicity of Islamic Bank in Indonesia and Other Countries Based on Shariah Objectives. 11th Islamic Conference on Islamic Economics and Finance, October 2016.
  7. Aslam, E., bhati, F., Ishfaq, M., & Shahzad Shabbir, M. (2022). Factors Affecting Customer Retention In Islamic Banks: A Case Study Of Pakistan. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 2022(12), 448–457. http://journalppw.com
  8. Asutay, M., & Harningtyas, A. F. (2015). Developing Maqasid al-Shari’ah Index to Evaluate Social Performance of Islamic Banks: A Conceptual and Empirical Attempt. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 1, 1.
  9. Bank Muamalat Indonesia. (2023a). Laporan Keberlanjutan 2023.
  10. Bank Muamalat Indonesia. (2023b). Laporan Tahunan 2023.
  11. Bank Muamalat Indonesia. (2023c). Tata Kelola Perusahaan 2023.
  12. Bank Syariah Indonesia. (2023a). Laporan Keberlanjutan 2023.
  13. Bank Syariah Indonesia. (2023b). Laporan Pelaksanaan Tata Kelola 2023.
  14. Bank Syariah Indonesia. (2023c). Laporan Tahunan 2023. In Laporan Tahunan 2023 PT Bank Syariah Indonesia TBK. https://ir.bankbsi.co.id/misc/AR/AR2023-ID.pdf
  15. Basrowi, Ali, J. haji, & Suyanto, T. (2022). Customer Loyalty Of Sharia Bank: Analysis Of Customer Satisfaction Level. NeuroQuantology, 20(August), 8328–8341. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2022.20.10.NQ55820
  16. Bedoui, M. H. eddine. (2012). Shari‘a-based ethical performance measurement framework. Chair CEFN (Chaire Ethique et Norme de La Finance) Du Centre d’Economie de La Sorbonne), October, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18433.66401
  17. Bhinekawati, R., & Suryono, S. (2022). Implementasi Maslahah Performa Berdasarkan Pandangan Maqasid Syariah pada Koperasi Kopi Alam Korintji.
  18. Jesya, 5(2), 1512–1526. https://doi.org/10.36778/jesya.v5i2.731
  19. PBI No. 13 2011, Peraturan Bank Indonesia 1 (2011).
  20. Burak, E., Erdil, O., & Altindağ, E. (2016). Effect of Corporate Governance Principles on Business Performance. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 05(07), 08–21. https://doi.org/10.52283/nswrca.ajbmr.20150507a02
  21. Cakhyaneu, A., Puspitasari, F., Tanuatmodjo, H., & Firmansyah. (2020). Kinerja Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah berdasarkan Sharia Maqashid Index (Studi pada BPRS di Provinsi Jawa Barat Tahun 2016-2018). Ekspansi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan, Perbankan Dan Akuntansi, 12(2), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.35313/ekspansi.v12i2.2210
  22. Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5
  23. Cinintya, P. B. (2022). Intellectual Capital and Social Performance of Islamic Banks in Indonesia and Malaysia: the Moderating Role of Sharia Supervisory Boards. In Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance (Vol. 18, Issue August). https://doi.org/10.17576/ajag-2022-18-06
  24. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business Research Methods (12th Editi). McGraw-Hill.
  25. Faizah, N., & Oktarina, A. (2023). Pengukuran Kinerja Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah dengan Pendekatan Maslahah Performa (MaP) (Studi pada BPRS Bangun Drajat Warga Yogyakarta). Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 9(01), 1523–1531.
  26. Firdaus, A. (2017). Maslahah Performa (MaP): Sistem Manajemen Kinerja Berbasis Maslahah (2nd ed., Issue Oktober). K-Media.
  27. Firdaus, A. (2018). Mengembangkan Siklus Penerapan Sistem Manajemen Kinerja Berbasis Kemaslahatan. Al-Uqud : Journal of Islamic Economics, 2(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.26740/al-uqud.v2n1.p94-120
  28. Firdaus, A. (2021). Determination of organisational essential needs as the basis for developing a maṣlaḥah-based performance measurement. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 13(2), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-11-2017-0041
  29. Firdaus, A., & Ahmad, K. (2023). Islamic Business and Performance Management: The Maslahah-Based Performance Management System. In Islamic Business and Performance Management: The Maslahah-Based Performance Management System (1st ed.). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003390947
  30. Hamidi, M. L., & Worthington, A. C. (2023). Beyond the triple bottom line: Prosperity, People, Planet, and Prophet in Islamic banking. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(2), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-02-2021-0036
  31. IFSB. (2023). Revised Guiding Principles On Corporate Governance For Institutions Offering Islamic Financial Services (Banking Segment) (Issue December). https://www.ifsb.org/standards-page/
  32. Julia, T., & Kassim, S. (2020). Exploring green banking performance of Islamic banks vs conventional banks in Bangladesh based on Maqasid Shariah framework. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11(3), 729–744. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-10-2017-0105
  33. Kasfuri, W. (2023). Pengukuran Kinerja Baitul Mal Bener Meriah dengan Pendekatan Maslahah Performa (MaP). Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh.
  34. Khattak, M. A. (2018). Protection and Distribution of Wealth , Commercial and Financial Transactions : Maqasid al-Shariah perspective. European Journal of Islamic Finance, 10, 1–8. http://www.ojs.unito.it/index.php/EJIF
  35. Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th Editio). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=nE1aDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Krippendorff,+Klaus.+2013.+Content+Analysis:+An+Introduction+to+Its+Methodology.+Los+Angeles,+CA:+Sage+Publications.&ots=y_akVqdPcu&sig=ko_WLK-NqK9YGEifmxseeisFjgw&redir_esc=y#v=o
  36. Lesmana, S., & Haron, M. H. (2019). Maqasid Shariah Based Performance of Islamic Banks , Islamic Corporate Governance , and Contingency Theory : a Theoretical Framework. International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business (IJAFB), 4(24), 70–86.
  37. McKinsey & Company. (2022). The 2022 McKinsey Global Payments Report. In McKinsey & Company Global Banking Practice. (Issue October). https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/the-2022-mckinsey-global-payments-report
  38. Mergaliyev, A., Asutay, M., Avdukic, A., & Karbhari, Y. (2021). Higher Ethical Objective (Maqasid al-Shari’ah) Augmented Framework for Islamic Banks: Assessing Ethical Performance and Exploring Its Determinants. In Journal of Business Ethics (Vol. 170, Issue 4). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04331-4
  39. Mohammed, M. O., & Taib, F. M. (2015). Developing Islamic Banking Performance Measures Based on Maqasid Al-Shari’ah Framework: Cases of 24 Selected Banks. In Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance (pp. 55–78).
  40. Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The Content Analysis Handbook. In Sage Publications.
  41. OECD. (2024). Dividend payments by state-owned enterprises Policies and practices. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/bf84ff64-en
  42. POJK No 8 2014, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan 1 (2014).
  43. POJK No 24 2015, 1 (2015).
  44. POJK No 44 2015, (2015).
  45. POJK No 12 2023, 1 (2016). https://www.ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Documents/Pages/Peraturan-Otoritas-Jasa-Keuangan-Nomor-12-Tahun-2023-tentang-Unit-Usaha-Syariah-%28POJK-UUS%29/POJK 12 Tahun 2023 - UNIT USAHA SYARIAH.pdf
  46. POJK No 4 2016, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan 1 (2016).
  47. POJK No 55 2016, (2016).
  48. POJK No 47 2017, (2017). https://medium.com/@arifwicaksanaa/pengertian-use-case-a7e576e1b6bf
  49. POJK No 51 2017, 1 (2017).
  50. SEOJK No 13 2017, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan 31 (2017).
  51. POJK No 35 2018, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan 2 (2018). https://www.ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Documents/Pages/Penyelenggaraan-Usaha-Perusahaan-Pembiayaan/pojk 35-2018.pdf
  52. POJK No 37 2019, 1 (2019). https://www.ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Documents/Pages/Transparansi-dan-Publikasi-Laporan-Bank/POJK 37-2019.pdf
  53. SEOJK No 10 2020, 1 SEOJK No. 10/SEOJK.03/2020 (2020).
  54. POJK No 12 2021, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan 1 (2021). https://sikepo.ojk.go.id/SIKEPO/DatabasePeraturan/PeraturanUtuh/84c36c57-c4bb-4815-9b13-c229
  55. POJK No 13 2021, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan 1 (2021).
  56. OJK. (2021). Roadmap Keuangan Berkelanjutan Tahap II (2021-2025). In Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.
  57. SEOJK No 16 2021, Pub. L. No. 16 (2021).
  58. OJK. (2023). Penguatan Sektor Jasa Keuangan dalam Menjaga Pertumbuhan Ekonomi: Laporan Kinerja OJK Tahun 2023.
  59. POJK No 19 2023, (2023).
  60. OJK. (2024a). Indonesia Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance (Issue February). https://www.ojk.go.id/keuanganberkelanjutan/BE/uploads/siaranpers/files/file_8ef04400-9a1b-430a-ba66-88f11a126877-27032024132325.pdf
  61. POJK No 2 2024, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (2024).
  62. POJK No 25 2024, (2024).
  63. OJK. (2024b). Statistik Perbankan Syariah (Vol. 29, Issue 06). https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787612
  64. Pellegrini, B., Carlo, Sergi, Bruno, Sironi, & Emiliano. (2021). Munich Personal RePEc Archive The Effect of the Adoption of an Alternative Corporate Governance System on Firms ’ Performances . The Case of Italian Unlisted SMEs . Department of Economic and Business Management Sciences and The effect of the adoption of. 104648.
  65. Prasetyowati, L. A., & Handoko, L. H. (2019). Pengukuran Kinerja Bank Umum Syariah Dengan Maqasid Index Dan Sharia Conformity And Profitability (SCNP). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Islam, 4(2), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.35836/jakis.v4i2.22
  66. UU RI No 40 2007, (2007).
  67. UU RI No 21 2008, (2008). https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/MT_Globalization_Report_2018.pdf%0Ahttp://eprints.lse.ac.uk/43447/1/India_globalisation, society and inequalities(lsero).pdf%0Ahttps://www.quora.com/What-is-the
  68. UU RI No 23 2011, (2011).
  69. Saad, M. A., & Fisol, W. N. M. (2019). Financial Technology (FinTech) Services: Analysis from The Perspective of Maqasid Al-Shariah. Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 2(6), 6–11. https://doi.org/10.26666/rmp.jssh.2019.6.2
  70. Sah, M. R. K., Firdaus, A., & Yasid, M. (2021). Kinerja Baitul Maal Wa At-Tamwil Umat Mandiri-Pesantren Hidayatullah Balikpapan Menggunakan Maslahah Performa. Al-Tijary, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21093/at.v7i1.3189
  71. Saoqi, A. A. Y. (2017). Analyzing the performance of Islamic banking in Indonesia and Malaysia: Maqasid index approach. Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 8(1), 29–50.
  72. Sari, I. P., Giriati, G., Listiana, E., Rustam, M., & Saputra, P. (2023). The Impact of Complaint Handling and Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty in Customers of Pontianak Branch of Bank Kalbar Syariah. East African Scholars Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 6(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.36349/easjebm.2023.v06i01.003
  73. Sodiq, A., Tri Ratnasari, R., & Mawardi, I. (2024). Analysis of the effect of Islamic Leadership and Job Satisfaction on sharia engagement and employee performance of Islamic Banks in Indonesia. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2362772
  74. Tarique, K. M., Islam, R., & Mohammed, M. O. (2021). Developing and validating the components of Maqasid al-Shari’ah-based performance measurement model for Islamic banks. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 14(2), 366–390. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-12-2018-0432
  75. Tjahjadi, B., Soewarno, N., & Mustikaningtiyas, F. (2021). Good corporate governance and corporate sustainability performance in Indonesia: A triple bottom line approach. Heliyon, 7(3), e06453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06453
  76. UN. (2023). SDGs Report 2023. In The Sustainable development Goals Report 2023: Special Edition (p. 80). https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/
  77. UNFCCC. (2023). Nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement. In United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Vol. 19689, Issue December). https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/cma2023_L17_adv.pdf
  78. Wira, A., Handra, H., & Syukria, A. (2018). Pengukuran Kinerja Perbankan Syariah dengan menggunakan Indeks Maqashid Syariah. Maqdis : Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Islam, 3(2), 145–156.

ISLAMICONOMIC: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam
Published by Departement of Islamic Economics, UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten - Indonesia

Main Building of Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten, Jenderal Sudirman Street, No. 30 Serang 42188 Banten Indonesia
Phone: +62 81511475475
Website: https://journal.islamiconomic.or.id/
Email: asep.dadan@uinbanten.ac.id

ISSN: 2085-3696 (Print)
ISSN: 2541-4127 (Online)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Get a feed by atom here, RRS2 here and OAI Links here

apps