collections_bookmark Focus and Scope

The Islamiconomic: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam seeks to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed articles that contribute to the understanding of Islamic economic principles, policies, and practices in contemporary settings. The journal encourages interdisciplinary research integrating Islamic economic theory with real-world applications across finance, trade, development, social justice, and ethical business practices.

Scope includes, but is not limited to:

1. Islamic Economic Theory
• Analysis and development of Islamic economic thought.
• Theoretical discussions on the principles of justice, equity, and welfare in Islamic economics.
• Comparisons between Islamic and conventional economic systems.
2. Islamic Finance and Banking
• Theoretical and practical aspects of Islamic finance, including Sukuk, Takaful, and Islamic banking practices.
• Risk management, financial instruments, and regulation within Islamic finance.
• Innovations in Islamic finance, including fintech, cryptocurrencies, and digital Islamic banking.
3. Halal Industry
• Development and regulation of the global halal industry.
• Research on halal certification, marketing, and consumption trends.
• Ethical business practices in halal food, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and tourism.
• The role of the halal industry in global trade and economic growth.
4. Islamic Social Finance
• The role of Zakat, Sadaqah, Waqf, and other Islamic social finance mechanisms in poverty alleviation and community development.
• Studies on the integration of social finance into sustainable development goals (SDGs).
5. Islamic Accounting
• Theoretical and practical approaches to Islamic accounting principles.
• The role of Islamic accounting in transparency, accountability, and ethical business practices.
• Analysis of accounting standards for Islamic financial institutions and the development of Islamic financial reporting frameworks.
• Islamic accounting practices in financial institutions, particularly in Islamic banks and firms.
6. Islamic Insurance (Takaful)
• Theoretical foundations and practical applications of Takaful (Islamic insurance).
• Risk-sharing and profit-loss sharing mechanisms in Islamic insurance.
• Regulatory frameworks and challenges for Takaful institutions.
• Innovations in Islamic insurance models and the role of Takaful in promoting financial inclusion.
7. Islamic Trade and Commerce
• Ethical business practices based on Islamic principles.
• Islamic perspectives on international trade, investment, and economic cooperation.
• Development of halal industries and the global halal economy.
8. Development Economics in Islamic Perspective
• Islamic perspectives on economic development, focusing on sustainable and inclusive growth.
• The role of Islamic economics in addressing global challenges such as poverty, inequality, and environmental sustainability.
9. Policy and Regulation
• Islamic economics and the formulation of public policies in Muslim-majority countries.
• Regulatory frameworks for Islamic finance institutions and markets.
10. Policy and Regulation
    • Empirical studies and case studies that explore applying Islamic economic principles in the real world.
    • Data-driven analysis of Islamic economic systems, financial markets, and socio-economic development.
11. Ethics and Philosophy in Economics
    • The role of Islamic ethics in shaping economic decisions, practices, and policies.
    • Philosophical underpinnings of Islamic economic thought.

create_new_folder Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

device_hub Peer Review Process

Islamiconomic: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam (IJEI) is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal. Every paper submitted to the Islamiconomic: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam (IJEI) for publication is subject to peer review. The peer review in this journal evaluates the submitted paper by two or more individuals of similar competence to the author. It aims to determine the academic paper's suitability for publication. The peer-review method is employed to maintain quality standards and provide credibility to the papers. The peer review at Islamiconomic: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam (IJEI) proceeds in 9 steps with the following description.

copyright Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

This journal is open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to users or / institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to full text articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or author. This is in accordance with Budapest Open Access Initiative

unarchive Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

bookmark_border Content Licensing, Copyright and Permissions

Islamiconomic have Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) licens

Islamiconomic is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

bookmark_border Publication Ethics Statement

Islamiconomic: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam (IJEI) is a peer-reviewed national journal, available in print and online and published two times a year. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the editorial board, the peer-reviewed­­­­­ and the publisher of Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed IJEI is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.  

Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten as publisher of IJEI takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. 

 Publication Decisions

The editor of the IJEI is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal’s editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

 Fair Play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor’s own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

 Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

 Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

 Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

 Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

 Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting Standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

 Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

 Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

 Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

 Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

 Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

 Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.