The Nexus Between Maqasid al Sharia and Affordable Housing Program: A Systematic Review

Muhammad Abdul Ghoni*  -  Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia, Indonesia
Muhammad Taufiq Affandi  -  University of Durham, United Kingdom

(*) Corresponding Author
DOI : 10.32678/ijei.v16i1.647

The affordable housing can be defined as housing for low-income people (MBR), who have limited ability to obtain housing and supported by government of Indonesia within the financing program throughout Islamic banking as stated in the Minister of Public Works and Public Housing Regulation Number 1 of 2021 on criteria for low-income people (MBR), easy requirements to build and own a house. This emphasizes the importance of affordable housing for low-income people is to promote the welfare of the people that in accordance to the objectives of the Shariah (Maqasid al Sharia). The current study examines the nexus between Maqasid al Sharia and legal regulation of republic Indonesia as the basis of affordable housing program. To explore and optimize the harmonization the objectives of the Shariah (Maqasid al Sharia) and legal regulation of republic Indonesia, we analyze the legal regulations contents of republic Indonesia to expose the indicators and spirits of the objectives of the Shariah (Maqasid al Sharia) in the affordable housing programs. Using Systematic review tool, these indications and spirit of the objectives of the Shariah (Maqasid al Sharia) are identified on the basis reviewed and analysis of legal regulation. A systematic study results show that, the indicators, and spirits of the Maqasid al Sharia; protection of religion (din), protection of life (Nafs), protection of intellect (Aql), protection of wealth (Mal), and protection of lineage (Nasl) are reflected in the legal regulation of Republic of Indonesia as groundbreaking affordable housing program.

Keywords : Maqasid al Sharia; Affordable Housing; Systematic Literature Review; Legal Regulations

  1. Abelson, P. (2009). Affordable Housing: Concepts and Policies*. Economic Papers, 28(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-3441.2009.00001.x
  2. Alhajri, M. F. (2022). Housing challenges and programs to enhance access to affordable housing in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101798
  3. Alkhudary, R., Brusset, X., & Fenies, P. (2020). Blockchain in general management and economics: a systematic literature review. European Business Review, 32(4), 765–783. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2019-0297
  4. Behrens, A. (2021). a Systematic Literature Review: How Agile Is Agile Project Management? Issues In Information Systems, 22(3), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.48009/3_iis_2021_298-316
  5. Chaudhary, S., Dhir, A., Ferraris, A., & Bertoldi, B. (2021). Trust and reputation in family businesses: A systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises. Journal of Business Research, 137(July), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.052
  6. Di Vaio, A., Palladino, R., Pezzi, A., & Kalisz, D. E. (2021). The role of digital innovation in knowledge management systems: A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 123(September 2020), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.042
  7. Do, Q., Ramudhin, A., Colicchia, C., Creazza, A., & Li, D. (2021). A systematic review of research on food loss and waste prevention and management for the circular economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 239(March 2020), 108209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108209
  8. Dusuki, A. W., & Bouheraoua, S. (2011). THE FRAMEWORK OF MAQĀS.ID AL-SHARĪʿAH AND ITS IMPLICATION FOR ISLAMIC FINANCE. Islam and Civilisational Renewal, 625–630.
  9. Guandalini, I. (2022). Sustainability through digital transformation: A systematic literature review for research guidance. Journal of Business Research, 148, 456–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.003
  10. Habitat for Humanity. (2021). Housing and the Sustainable Development Goals: The Transformational Impact of Housing, 21. Retrieved from https://www.habitat.org/sites/default/files/documents/Solid-Ground-SDG_booklet-update-2021.pdf,
  11. Haddoud, M. Y., Onjewu, A. K. E., Nowiński, W., & Jones, P. (2021). The determinants of SMEs’ export entry: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Business Research, 125(December 2020), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.017
  12. Hossain, M. R., Akhter, F., & Sultana, M. M. (2022). SMEs in Covid-19 Crisis and Combating Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and A Case from Emerging Economy. Operations Research Perspectives, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2022.100222
  13. Khan., M. A. (1994). Introduction to Islamic Economics. The International Institute of Islamic Thought (Vol. 15). https://doi.org/10.1016/0041-008X(92)90369-4
  14. Khan, M. K., Zaleha, S., Rasid, A., & Bardai, B. (2019). Waqf Cooperative Housing Model (WCHM) as an Innovative Solution for Affordable Housing. International Journal of Innovation and Business Strategy (IJIBS), 12(2), 36–48.
  15. Kolotylo-Kulkarni, M., Xia, W., & Dhillon, G. (2021). Information disclosure in e-commerce: A systematic review and agenda for future research. Journal of Business Research, 126(March 2020), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.006
  16. Li, K., Qin, Y., & Wu, J. (2020). Recent housing affordability in urban China: A comprehensive overview. China Economic Review, 59, 101362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101362
  17. Mandler, T., Sezen, B., Chen, J., & Özsomer, A. (2021). Performance consequences of marketing standardization/adaptation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 125(January), 416–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.023
  18. Mbithi, E., Moloi, T., & Wangombe, D. (2022). Corporate risk disclosure: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. Cogent Business and Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2105569
  19. Mortazavi, S., Eslami, M. H., Hajikhani, A., & Väätänen, J. (2021). Mapping inclusive innovation: A bibliometric study and literature review. Journal of Business Research, 122(August 2019), 736–750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.030
  20. Othman, N., Mohamad Zan, U. M., & Mat Nor, F. (2021). Investigating Rationales of Maqasid-Shariah and Well-being Indicator for B40 Households. The International Islamic Economic System Conference - The 9th I-IECONS 2021, 177–185.
  21. Racino, J. A. (2015). Public Administration and Disability. Public Administration and Disability. Broken Sound Parkway NW: Taylor & Francis Group.
  22. Razak, D. A., Mohammed, M. O., & Tarique, K. M. (2015). Abandoned Housing Projects in Malaysia and the Prospect of DP: An Overview. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31(15), 813–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01171-5
  23. Salehijam, M. (2018). The value of systematic content analysis in legal research. Tilburg Law Review, 23(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.5334/tilr.5
  24. Shuid, S., & Zamin, M. F. M. (2018). Maqasid al-syariah & human well-being: A study on melaka’s public housing. Planning Malaysia, 16(2), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.21837/pmjournal.v16.i6.478
  25. Siachou, E., Trichina, E., Papasolomou, I., & Sakka, G. (2021). Why do employees hide their knowledge and what are the consequences? A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 135(January), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.031
  26. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(March), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  27. Soederberg, S. (2017). Universal Access to Affordable Housing ? Interrogating an Elusive Development Goal Universal Access to Affordable Housing ? Interrogating an Elusive Development Goal, 7731(March). https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2016.1253937
  28. Sohaimi, N. S., Abdullah, A., Shuid, S., & Ahmad Sarkawi, A. (2015). An Overview of Masaqid Al-Syariah on Homeownership and Young Graduate’s Wellbeing through Sustainable Affordable Housing. Pusat Pengajian Sains Kemasyarakatan, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 1–10. Retrieved from http://eds.b.ebscohost.com/eds/detail/detail?vid=5&sid=b169947a-b83d-4403-95ce-be4222fadc4a%40pdc-v-sessmgr01&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmU%3D#AN=iium.50300&db=ir00474a
  29. Thottoli, M. M. (2022). The starring role of crowdfunding in GCC: a structured literature review. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 6(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajeb-02-2022-0022
  30. Treiblmaier, H., Mirkovski, K., Lowry, P. B., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2020). The physical internet as a new supply chain paradigm: a systematic literature review and a comprehensive framework. International Journal of Logistics Management, 31(2), 239–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-11-2018-0284
  31. Weng, Z.-C., & Tsai, F.-C. (2022). A Systematic Literature Review of Law Enforcement Image Systems (KES 2022) Recognition Methods based on Generative Adversarial Networks A Systematic Literature Review of Law Enforcement Image Recognition Methods based on Generative Adversarial Networks Fr. Procedia Computer Science, 207.
  32. Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
  33. Zamani, S. Z. (2022). Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) facing an evolving technological era: a systematic literature review on the adoption of technologies in SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(6), 735–757. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-07-2021-0360