COMPARISON OF ISLAMIC BANKS PERFORMANCE AND CONVENTIONAL BANKS PERFORMANCE IN MUSLIM-MAJORITY PROVINCES AND NON-MUSLIM MAJORITY PROVINCES

Eko Fajar Cahyono*  -  Islamic Economic Department Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
M. Fariz Fadillah Mardianto  -  Departemen of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Airlangga University, Indonesia
Tika Widiastuti  -  Islamic Economic Department Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia

(*) Corresponding Author

This study aims to look a universality services Islāmic banking and conventional bank services and products in Indonesia by testing whether the services and products of conventional Islāmic banks and conventional banks accepted by all groups, both Muslims and non-Muslims. The method used was the Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) test by comparing Islāmic banks performance and conventional banks performance represented by several financial ratios in a number of provinces in Indonesia. There are two provincial categories, namely the first group is a provincial province with a most Muslim population and the second is a class of provincial provinces with a most non-Muslim population in Indonesia.

Keywords : Universality, Bank, Islamic Bank, Bank Performance, MANOVA

  1. Adhikari dan Agrawal. (2017). Does local religiosity matter for bank risk-taking? Journal of Corporate Finance, 38, 272-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.01.009
  2. Darmawati, et al. (2018). Analisis pengaruh Kebudayaan, Sosial, Kepribadian dan Psikologis terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Shar’e (Survei pada nasabah Bank Muamalat Indonesia Cabang Purwokerto). Paper presented at the Performance.
  3. Halari, et al. (2018). Taking advantage of Ramadan and January in Muslim countries. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2018.05.018
  4. Ismail. (2011). Perbankan Syariah. Jakarta : Kencana Prenada.
  5. Kontot, et al. (2016). Determining Factors of Customers’ Preferences: A Case of Deposit Products in Islamic Banking. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224, 167-175. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.435
  6. Mathew, et al. (2014). Acceptance on Halal Food among Non-Muslim Consumers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 121, 262-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1127
  7. Muclish, A & Umardani, D. (2016). Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Bank Syariah dan Bank Konvensional di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen dan Pemasaran Jasa, 9(1), 129-156.
  8. Mulyana, R. A. (2018). Sikap dan Persepsi Konsumen terhadap Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia dan Malaysia. Jurnal Naratas, 1(1), 38-51.
  9. Mushtaq dan Siddiqui. (2017). Effect of interest rate on bank deposits: Evidences from Islamic and non-Islamic economies. Future Business Journal, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2017.01.002
  10. Rencher dan Schaalje. (2008). Linear models in statistics: John Wiley & Sons.
  11. Riaz, et al. (2017). Perceptions on Islamic banking in the UK—Potentialities for empowerment, challenges and the role of scholars. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 47, 39-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2016.11.002
  12. Said, et al. (2014). Assessing Consumers’ Perception, Knowledge and Religiosity on Malaysia's Halal Food Products. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 120-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.015
  13. Saragih, A.F. (2013). Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan Antara Bank Syariah Dengan Bank Konvensional. Jurnal Akuntansiku, 1(1).
  14. Sari, Ditta Feicyllia. 2015. Analisis Efisiensi Pembiayaan Bank Umum Syariah dan Bank Umum Konvensional di Indonesia Dengan Metode Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Skripsi Tidak Dipublikasikan. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Airlangga.
  15. Sarwono, J. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif.
  16. Suhardi, G. (2017). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kepercayaan dan loyalitas nasabah perbankan di Surabaya. KINERJA, 10(1), 50-56.
  17. Wasiuzzaman, S. (2018). Seasonality in the Saudi stock market: The Hajj effect. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 67, 273-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2017.07.007
  18. Wibowo, M. W., & Ahmad, F. S. (2016). Non-Muslim consumers’ halal food product acceptance model. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 276-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30125-3
  19. Yulianti & Suprayogi, N. (2016). Komparasi Efisiensi Penghimpunan Dana Pihak Ketiga Bank Umum Syariah dan Bank Umum Konvensional di Indonesia Dengan Metode Data Envelopment Analysis. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Teori dan Terapan, 3(4), 280 – 294.

ISLAMICONOMIC: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam
Published by Departement of Islamic Economics, UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten - Indonesia

Main Building of Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business, UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten, Jenderal Sudirman Street, No. 30 Serang 42188 Banten Indonesia
Phone: +62 81511475475
Website: https://journal.islamiconomic.or.id/
Email: asep.dadan@uinbanten.ac.id

ISSN: 2085-3696 (Print)
ISSN: 2541-4127 (Online)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Get a feed by atom here, RRS2 here and OAI Links here

apps